December 21, 2025 - Delphi Museum free entry day !

Imagine stepping into a world where history, art, and culture converge—all without spending a single dime. That’s exactly what happens on the Delphi Museum’s Free Entry Day of December 21, 2025.

As the doors swing open, a wave of excitement and curiosity washes over visitors of all ages, eager to explore the treasures within. Free Entry Day isn’t just about access; it’s about community. It’s a celebration of culture as a universal gift, inviting everyone to connect with the past and inspire the future.

Whether you’re a first-time visitor or a seasoned enthusiast, it’s an opportunity to immerse yourself in beauty and knowledge of the Navel of the World —completely gratis.

So, mark your calendar, gather your friends and family, and embrace the magic of a day where curiosity has no cost. The museum awaits, ready to open its doors to endless cultural adventures and timeless wonders—free of charge, but priceless in experience.

December 7, 2025 - Delphi Museum free entry day !

Imagine stepping into a world where history, art, and culture converge—all without spending a single dime. That’s exactly what happens on the Delphi Museum’s Free Entry Day of December 7, 2025.

As the doors swing open, a wave of excitement and curiosity washes over visitors of all ages, eager to explore the treasures within. Free Entry Day isn’t just about access; it’s about community. It’s a celebration of culture as a universal gift, inviting everyone to connect with the past and inspire the future.

Whether you’re a first-time visitor or a seasoned enthusiast, it’s an opportunity to immerse yourself in beauty and knowledge of the Navel of the World —completely gratis.

So, mark your calendar, gather your friends and family, and embrace the magic of a day where curiosity has no cost. The museum awaits, ready to open its doors to endless cultural adventures and timeless wonders—free of charge, but priceless in experience.

International Museum Day 2025

International Museum Day 2025
International Museum Day 2025 poster

International Museum Day 2025 – free entrance to the Delphi Museum

Delphi Museum is celebrating on Sunday May 18, the International Museum Day. Entrance to the Delphi Museum and the Archaeological site of Apollo will be free.

The International Museum Day 2025

Every year, on 18 May, the International Council of Museums (ICOM) organises International Museum Day (IMD), a global event highlighting the transformative role of museums in society. In 2025, IMD will explore “The Future of Museums in Rapidly Changing Communities”, focusing on how museums can navigate and contribute to a world undergoing profound social, technological, and environmental shifts.

Museums are more than spaces of preservation—they are active participants in shaping sustainable and inclusive communities. This year’s theme aligns with three Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):

SDG 8: Museums support local economies by creating employment opportunities and offering educational programs that empower communities.

SDG 9: By fostering creativity and embracing technological advancements, museums drive innovation and enhance accessibility.

SDG 11: Museums contribute to sustainable urban development by acting as cultural hubs that promote inclusion, resilience, and heritage preservation.

More information on the International Museum Day here

Gaia, the Mother Earth and Delphi

Anselm Feuerbach: Gaea (1875). Ceiling painting, Academy of Fine Arts Vienna, Austria

For most people Delphi is linked to the god of light, Apollo. But it was not always the case. The sanctuary has a history that begins long before the advent of Apollo. A history where women (and especially in their symbolic role of mothers) were in charge: The cult of Gaia, the Mother Earth, one of the first deities in all the cosmogonic myths of mankind, was attested at Delphi.

Anselm Feuerbach: Gaea (1875). Ceiling painting, Academy of Fine Arts Vienna, Austria.

Tradition and myth report that Delphi, originally called Pytho, was sacred to Ge or Gaia (Γη/Γαία = Mother Earth, the ancestral mother -sometimes parthenogenic- of all life) and that an oracle presided near a cave inhabited by the serpent Python, the son of Ge.

This first matriarchal period of Delphi is attested by the Delphic inscriptions found in place during the excavations. They mention the phrase «το ποτι γας ιαρον» (to poti Gas iaron) = what was once the sanctuary of the Earth. According to the archaeological research the sanctuary Ge would have been located a little northern of the present-day sanctuary of Apollo.

Another element that testifies the matriarchal power at Delphi is the name of Delphi itself. The ancient Greek word δελφύς (delfys), related to the name of Delphi, means womb. It’s exactly the shape of the valley of the Phaedriades when seen from the port Kirrha -the major access point to Delphi in ancient times.

Then Apollo arrives. The god of light establishes his power by killing the Python the son of Ge. He takes possession of the existent sanctuary and oracle of Gaia, the Mother Earth. At the same time asserts the patriarchal power: it’s then that the Ancient Greek society transitions from homometric (same mother) to homopatric (same father).

Sculpture by Pietro Francavilla of Apollo's first triumph, when he slew with his bow and arrows the serpent Python, which lies dead at his feet. The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore, USA

This brings the distribution of the families land to the male descendants and, gradually, at what is known as the Greek colonization (8th c. B.C.): the quest of new land lots. It’s the beginning of an expansion of the Greek world all over the Mediterranean sea, and the (new) Oracle of Apollo at Delphi takes the lead and has a vital role in it.

Manufacture of Ancient Greek Pottery

Ancient Greek pottery, the pot­tery of An­cient Greeks, is im­por­tant to us firstly for the in­trin­sic beauty of its forms and dec­o­ra­tion and secondly, for the light it sheds on the de­vel­op­ment of Greek pic­to­r­ial art.

Be­cause fired clay pot­tery is highly durable —and few or no Greek works in wood, tex­tile, or wall paint­ing have sur­vived— the painted dec­o­ra­tion of this pot­tery has be­come the main source of in­for­ma­tion about the process whereby Greek artists grad­u­ally solved the many prob­lems of rep­re­sent­ing three-di­men­sional ob­jects and fig­ures on a flat or curved sur­face.

blackfigure Ancient Greek pottery

The large num­ber of sur­viv­ing ex­am­ples is also the re­sult of a much wider re­liance on pot­tery ves­sels in a pe­riod when other ma­te­ri­als were ex­pen­sive or un­known.

Ancient Greek pot­tery ves­sels was used by the Greeks pri­mar­ily to store, trans­port, and drink such liq­uids as wine and wa­ter. Smaller pots were used as con­tain­ers for per­fumes and unguents.

Manufacture of Ancient Greek Pottery
Ancient Greek pottery techniques

Con­struc­tion

clay, the base of pottery

Clay powder

The process of mak­ing a pot and fir­ing it is fairly sim­ple. The first thing a pot­ter needs is clay. When clay is first dug out of the ground it is full of rocks and shells and other use­less items that need to be re­moved. To do this the pot­ter mixes the clay with wa­ter and lets all the im­pu­ri­ties sink to the bot­tom. This is called levi­ga­tion or elu­tri­a­tion. This process can be done many times. The more times this is done, the smoother clay be­comes.

A potter's wheel

A potter's wheel

The clay is then kneaded by the pot­ter and placed on a wheel. Once the clay is on the wheel the pot­ter can shape it into any of the many shapes shown be­low or any­thing else he de­sires.

Ancient Greek pottery pots were usu­ally made in sec­tions such as the body and feet and spout. Even the body, if it were larger than 20 cen­time­ters, might be made in sep­a­rate sections and glued to­gether later with a thin wa­tery clay called slip. Af­ter the pot is made then the pot­ter paints it with a very pure black slip (made from the same clay) and a brush.

Ancient Greek pottery, un­like to­day's pot­tery, was only fired once, but that fir­ing had three stages. Af­ter the pot­tery is stacked in­side the kiln our pot­ter can start the first stage. He heats the kiln up to around 800°C with all the vents on the sides open to let air in. This turns the pot­tery and the paint red all over. Once the kiln reaches 800°C the vents are closed and the tem­per­a­ture is raised to 950°C and then al­lowed to drop back to 900°C. This turns the pot­tery and the paint all black.

The pot­ter then starts the third and fi­nal phase by open­ing the vents and al­low­ing the kiln to cool all the way down. This last phase leaves the slip black but turns the pot­tery back to red. This hap­pens be­cause when the clay is given air it turns red, but when the black slip is heated to 950°C it no longer al­lows air in. So the slipped area stays black while the bare ar­eas stay red.

Wheel made pot­tery dates back to roughly 2500 BC where be­fore the coil method of build­ing the walls of the pot was em­ployed. Most Greek vases were wheel­made, though as with the Rhy­ton mould-made pieces (so-called "plas­tic" pieces) are also found and dec­o­ra­tive el­e­ments ei­ther hand formed or by mould were added to thrown pots.

More com­plex pieces were made in parts then as­sem­bled when it was leather hard by means of join­ing with a slip, where the pot­ter re­turned to the wheel for the fi­nal shap­ing, or turn­ing. It was then slipped and in­cised ready for the kiln.

Dec­o­ra­tion and fir­ing of Ancient Greek pottery

The strik­ing black slip with a metal­lic sheen, so char­ac­ter­is­tic of Greek pot­tery was a fine sus­pen­sion (col­loidal frac­tion) of an il­litic clay with very low cal­cium ox­ide con­tent which was rich in iron ox­ides and hy­drox­ides, dif­fer­en­ti­at­ing from that used for the body of the vase in terms of the cal­cium con­tent, the ex­act min­eral com­po­si­tion and the par­ti­cle size. This clay sus­pen­sion was most prob­a­bly col­lected in situ from spe­cially lo­cated il­litic clay beds that pro­duced spon­ta­neous col­loidal dis­per­sion in rain wa­ter.

Gas operated pottery kiln

The sta­bil­ity of the chem­i­cal com­po­si­tion of the At­tic black slip ar­gues against the use of added def­floc­u­lants such as wood or other plant ashes, urea, tan­nins, even blood, sug­gested by sev­eral au­thors dur­ing the 20th cen­tury. This clay sus­pen­sion was thick­ened by con­cen­tra­tion to a paste and was used for the dec­o­ra­tion of the sur­face of the vase. The paint was ap­plied on the ar­eas in­tended to be­come black af­ter fir­ing.

The black color ef­fect was achieved by means of chang­ing the amount of oxy­gen pre­sent dur­ing fir­ing. This was done in a sin­gle cy­cle, in a process known as three-phase fir­ing.

First, the kiln was heated to around 920-950°C, with all vents open bring­ing oxy­gen into the fir­ing cham­ber and turn­ing both pot and slip a red­dish-brown (ox­i­dis­ing con­di­tions) due to the for­ma­tion of hematite (Fe2O3) in both the paint and the clay body. Then the vent was closed and green wood in­tro­duced, cre­at­ing car­bon monox­ide which turns the red hematite to black mag­netite(Fe3O4); at this stage the tem­per­a­ture de­creases due to in­com­plete com­bus­tion.

In a fi­nal re­ox­i­diz­ing phase (at about 800-850 °C) the kiln was opened and oxy­gen rein­tro­duced caus­ing the un­slipped re­served clay to go back to or­ange-red. In the pre­vi­ous phase, chem­i­cal com­po­si­tion of the slipped sur­face had been al­tered, so it could no longer be ox­i­dized and re­mained black.

An excellent video from the Getty will show you the making of a greek pottery.

Ancient Greek pottery styles

An­cient Greek pot­tery inform us on the de­vel­op­ment of Greek pic­to­r­ial art. The intricately painted scenes on An­cient Greek pottery is the result of hundreds of years of stylized evolution that occurred after the collapse of the Mycenaean Palace culture (ca. 1050 BCE).

The painting styles used on pottery from the Proto-Geometric period (ca. 1050 BCE) to the late Hellenistic period (late 4th century BCE) show the progression of simplistic painted designs to the elaborate scenes of everyday life and mythology that the Greeks are known for.

Achilles-and-Ajax-playing-a-board-game-overseen-by-Athena-detail

Achilles and Ajax playing a board game, overseen by Athena (detail)

Ancient Greek pottery styles

Pro­to­ge­o­met­ric styles

Vases of pro­to­ge­o­met­ri­cal pe­riod (c. 1050 – 900 BC) rep­re­sent the re­turn of craft pro­duc­tion af­ter the col­lapse of the Myce­naean Palace cul­ture and the en­su­ing Greek dark ages.

ancient greek pottery protogeometric style

Ancient Greek pottery protogeometric style

Pottery is one of the few modes of artis­tic ex­pres­sion be­sides jew­elry in this pe­riod since the sculp­ture, mon­u­men­tal ar­chi­tec­ture and mural paint­ing of this era are un­known to us. Yet by 1050 BC life in the Greek penin­sula seems to have be­come suf­fi­ciently set­tled to al­low a marked im­prove­ment in the pro­duc­tion of earth­en­ware. The style is con­fined to the ren­der­ing of cir­cles, tri­an­gles, wavy lines and arcs, but placed with ev­i­dent con­sid­er­a­tion and no­table dex­ter­ity, prob­a­bly aided by com­pass and mul­ti­ple brush.


Geo­met­ric style

Geo­met­ri­cal art flour­ished in the 9th and 8th cen­turies BC. It was char­ac­ter­ized by new mo­tifs, break­ing with the iconog­ra­phy of the Mi­noan and Myce­naean pe­ri­ods: me­an­ders, tri­an­gles and other geo­met­ri­cal dec­o­ra­tion (from whence the name of the style) as dis­tinct from the pre­dom­i­nantly cir­cu­lar fig­ures of the pre­vi­ous style.

The best ex­am­ples we have were grave goods, which of­ten al­lows us to dif­fer­en­ti­ate At­tic, other main­land and is­land styles since we may as­sume they were pro­duced in a batch for the sole pur­pose of bur­ial. How­ever our chronol­ogy comes from ex­ported wares found in dat­a­ble con­texts over­seas.

geometric style pyxis

Geometric style

With the early geo­met­ri­cal style (ap­prox­i­mately 900-850 B.C) one finds only ab­stract mo­tifs, in what is called the “Black Dipy­lon” style, which is char­ac­ter­ized by an ex­ten­sive use of black var­nish. With the Mid­dle Geo­met­ri­cal (ap­prox. 850-770 BC), fig­u­ra­tive dec­o­ra­tion makes its ap­pear­ance: they are ini­tially iden­ti­cal bands of an­i­mals such as horses, stags, goats, geese, etc. Which al­ter­nate with the geo­met­ri­cal bands.

In par­al­lel, the dec­o­ra­tion be­comes com­pli­cated and be­comes in­creas­ingly or­nate. The painter feels re­luc­tant to leave empty spaces and fills them with me­an­ders or swastikas. This phase is named hor­ror vacui and will not cease un­til the end of geo­met­ri­cal pe­riod.

In the mid­dle of the cen­tury there be­gin to ap­pear hu­man fig­ures. The best known rep­re­sen­ta­tions of which are those of the vases found in Dipy­lon, one of the ceme­ter­ies of Athens. The frag­ments of these large fu­ner­ary vases show mainly pro­ces­sions of char­i­ots or war­riors or of the fu­ner­ary scenes: πρόθεσις / proth­e­sis or ἐκφορά / ekphora.

Dipylon amphora

Dipylon amphora. Athenian funerary amphora, Late geometric I. The main scene shows the prothesis and mourning for the dead. Over the bier is the shroud. Men, women and a child lament with the hands on their heads in the usual mourning gesture. (760 - 750 BC)

The bod­ies are rep­re­sented in a geo­met­ri­cal way ex­cept for the calves, which are rather pro­tu­ber­ant. In the case of sol­diers, a shield in form of a Di­a­bolo, called “Dipy­lon shield” be­cause of its char­ac­ter­is­tic draw­ing, cov­ers the cen­tral part of the body. The legs and the necks of the horses, the wheels of the char­i­ots are rep­re­sented one be­side the other with­out per­spec­tive. The hand of this painter, so called in the ab­sence of sig­na­ture, is the Dipy­lon Mas­ter, could be iden­ti­fied on sev­eral pieces, in par­tic­u­lar mon­u­men­tal am­phorae.

At the end of the pe­riod there ap­pear rep­re­sen­ta­tions of mythol­ogy, prob­a­bly at the mo­ment when Homer cod­i­fies the tra­di­tions of Tro­jan cy­cle in the Il­iad and the Odyssey. Here how­ever, the in­ter­pre­ta­tion con­sti­tutes a risk for the mod­ern ob­server: a con­fronta­tion be­tween two war­riors can be as well a Home­ric duel as a sim­ple com­bat; a failed boat can rep­re­sent the ship­wreck of Odysseus or any hap­less sailor.

Lastly, we have the lo­cal schools that ap­pear in Greece. Pro­duc­tion of vases was largely the pre­rog­a­tive of Athens – it is well at­tested that as in the proto-geo­met­ri­cal pe­riod, in Corinth, Boeo­tia, Ar­gos, Crete and Cy­clades, the painters and pot­ters were sat­is­fied to fol­low the At­tic style. From about the 8th cen­tury BC on, they cre­ated their own styles, Ar­gos spe­cial­iz­ing in the fig­u­ra­tive scenes, Crete re­main­ing at­tached to a more strict ab­strac­tion.


Ori­en­tal­iz­ing style

The ori­en­tal­iz­ing style was the prod­uct of cul­tural fer­ment in the Aegean and East­ern Mediter­ranean of the 8th and 7th cen­turies BC. Fos­tered by trade links with the city-states of Asian Mi­nor the ar­ti­facts of the East in­flu­enced a highly styl­ized yet rec­og­niz­able rep­re­sen­ta­tional art. Ivories, pot­tery and met­al­work from the Neo-Hit­tite prin­ci­pal­i­ties of north­ern Syria and Phoeni­cia found their way to Greece, as did goods from Ana­to­lian Urartu and Phry­gia, yet there was lit­tle con­tact with the cul­tural cen­ters of Egypt or As­syria.

Corinthian jug. 620 BC. Staatliche Antikensammlungen

Corinthian jug. 620 BC. Staatliche Antikensammlungen

The new id­iom de­vel­oped ini­tially in Corinth (as Proto-Corinthian) and later in Athens be­tween circa 725 BC to 625 BC (as Proto-At­tic). It was char­ac­ter­ized by an ex­panded vo­cab­u­lary of mo­tifs: sphinx, grif­fin, li­ons, etc., as well as a reper­tory of non-mytho­log­i­cal an­i­mals arranged in friezes across the belly of the vase. In these friezes, painters also be­gan to ap­ply lo­tuses or pal­mettes.

De­pic­tions of hu­mans were rel­a­tively rare. Those that have been found are fig­ures in sil­hou­ette with some in­cised de­tail, per­haps the ori­gin of the in­cised sil­hou­ette fig­ures of the black-fig­ure pe­riod. There is suf­fi­cient de­tail on these fig­ures to al­low schol­ars to dis­cern a num­ber of dif­fer­ent artists” hands. Geo­met­ri­cal fea­tures re­mained in the style called proto-Corinthian that em­braced these ori­en­tal­iz­ing ex­per­i­ments, yet which co­ex­isted with a con­ser­v­a­tive sub-geo­met­ric style.

The ce­ram­ics of Corinth were ex­ported all over Greece, and their technique ar­rived in Athens, prompt­ing the de­vel­op­ment of a less markedly East­ern id­iom there. Dur­ing this time de­scribed as Proto-At­tic, the ori­en­tal­iz­ing mo­tifs ap­pear but the fea­tures re­main not very re­al­is­tic.

The painters show a pref­er­ence for the typ­i­cal scenes of the Geo­met­ri­cal Pe­riod, like pro­ces­sions of char­i­ots. How­ever, they adopt the prin­ci­ple of line draw­ing to re­place the sil­hou­ette. In the mid­dle of 7th cen­tury BC, there ap­pears the black and white style: black fig­ures on a white zone, ac­com­pa­nied by poly­chromy to ren­der the color of the flesh or cloth­ing.

Clay used in Athens was much more or­ange than that of Corinth, and so did not lend it­self as eas­ily to the rep­re­sen­ta­tion of flesh. At­tic Ori­en­tal­is­ing Painters in­clude the Analatos Painter, the Meso­geia Painter and the Polyphe­mos Painter.

Crete, and es­pe­cially the is­lands of the Cy­clades, are char­ac­ter­ized by their at­trac­tion to the vases known as “plas­tic”, i.e. those whose paunch or col­lar is moulded in the shape of head of an an­i­mal or a man. At Aegina, the most pop­u­lar form of the plas­tic vase is the head of the grif­fin. The Melane­sian am­phoras, man­u­fac­tured at Paros, ex­hibit lit­tle knowl­edge of Corinthian de­vel­op­ments. They pre­sent a marked taste for the epic com­po­si­tion and a hor­ror vacui, which is ex­pressed in an abun­dance of swastikas and me­an­ders.

Fi­nally one can iden­tify the last ma­jor style of the pe­riod, that of Wild Goat Style, al­lot­ted tra­di­tion­ally to Rhodes be­cause of an im­por­tant dis­cov­ery within the necrop­o­lis of Kameiros. In fact, it is wide­spread over all of Asia Mi­nor, with cen­ters of pro­duc­tion at Mile­tos and Chios. Two forms pre­vail: oeno­choes, which copied bronze mod­els, and dishes, with or with­out feet. The dec­o­ra­tion is or­ga­nized in su­per­im­posed reg­is­ters in which styl­ized an­i­mals, in par­tic­u­lar of feral goats (from whence the name) pur­sue each other in friezes. Many dec­o­ra­tive mo­tifs (flo­ral tri­an­gles, swastikas, etc.) fill the empty spaces.


Black fig­ure

The black-fig­ure pe­riod co­in­cides ap­prox­i­mately with the era des­ig­nated by Winkel­mann as the mid­dle to late Ar­chaic, from c. 620 to 480 BC. The tech­nique of in­cis­ing sil­hou­et­ted fig­ures with en­liven­ing de­tail which we now call the black-fig­ure method was, as we saw, a Corinthian in­ven­tion of the 7th cen­tury and spread from there to other city states and re­gions in­clud­ing Sparta, Boeo­tia, Eu­boea, the east Greek is­lands and Athens.

blackfigure Greek pottery

Blackfigure Greek pottery

The Corinthian fab­ric, ex­ten­sively stud­ied by Hum­fry Payne and Dar­rell Amyx, can be traced though the par­al­lel treat­ment of an­i­mal and hu­man fig­ures. The an­i­mal mo­tifs have greater promi­nence on the vase and show the great­est ex­per­i­men­ta­tion in the early phase of Corinthian black-fig­ure. As Corinthian artists gained in con­fi­dence in their ren­der­ing of the hu­man fig­ure the an­i­mal frieze de­clined in size rel­a­tive to the hu­man scene dur­ing the mid­dle to late phase. By the mid-6th cen­tury BC, the qual­ity of Corinthian ware had fallen away sig­nif­i­cantly to the ex­tent that some Corinthian pot­ters would dis­guise their pots with a red slip in im­i­ta­tion of su­pe­rior Athen­ian ware.

At Athens, re­searchers have found the ear­li­est known ex­am­ples of vase painters sign­ing their work, the first be­ing a Di­nos by Sophi­los (il­lus. be­low, BM c. 580), this per­haps in­dica­tive of their in­creas­ing am­bi­tion as artists in pro­duc­ing the mon­u­men­tal work de­manded as grave mark­ers, as for ex­am­ple with Kleitias’s François Vase. Many schol­ars con­sider the finest work in the style to be­long Ex­ekias and the Ama­sis Painter, who are noted for their feel­ing for com­po­si­tion and nar­ra­tive.

Circa 520 BC the red-fig­ure tech­nique was de­vel­oped and was grad­u­ally in­tro­duced in the form of the bilin­gual vase by the An­dokides Painter, Oltos and Psiax.[14] Red-fig­ure quickly eclipsed black-fig­ure yet in the unique form of the Panathanaic Am­phora, black-fig­ure con­tin­ued to be utilised well into the 4th cen­tury BC.


Red fig­ure

The in­no­va­tion of the red-fig­ure tech­nique was an Athen­ian in­ven­tion of the late 6th cen­tury. The abil­ity to ren­der de­tail by di­rect paint­ing rather than in­ci­sion of­fered new ex­pres­sive pos­si­bil­i­ties to artists such as three-quar­ter pro­files, greater anatom­i­cal de­tail and the rep­re­sen­ta­tion of per­spec­tive. The first gen­er­a­tion of red-fig­ure painters worked in both red- and black-fig­ure as well as other meth­ods in­clud­ing Six”s tech­nique and white ground; the lat­ter was de­vel­oped at the same time as red-fig­ure.

The wedding of Thetis, pyxis by the Wedding Painter, circa 470/460 BC. Louvre Museum, Paris France

The wedding of Thetis, pyxis by the Wedding Painter, circa 470/460 BC. Louvre Museum, Paris, France.

How­ever, within twenty years, ex­per­i­men­ta­tion had given way to spe­cial­iza­tion as seen in the vases of the Pi­o­neer Group, whose fig­ural work was ex­clu­sively in red-fig­ure, though they re­tained the use of black-fig­ure for some early flo­ral or­na­men­ta­tion. The shared val­ues and goals of The Pi­o­neers such as Eu­phro­nios and Eu­thymides sig­nal that they were some­thing ap­proach­ing a self-con­scious move­ment, though they left be­hind no tes­ta­ment other than their own work. John Board­man said of the re­search on their work that “the re­con­struc­tion of their ca­reers, com­mon pur­pose, even ri­val­ries, can be taken as an ar­chae­o­log­i­cal tri­umph”

The next gen­er­a­tion of late Ar­chaic vase painters (c. 500 to 480 BC) brought an in­creas­ing nat­u­ral­ism to the style as seen in the grad­ual change of the pro­file eye. This phase also sees the spe­cial­iza­tion of painters into pot and cup painters, with the Berlin and Kleophrades Painters no­table in the for­mer cat­e­gory and Douris and Ones­i­mos in the lat­ter.

By the early to high clas­si­cal era of red-fig­ure paint­ing (c. 480 to 425 BC), a num­ber of dis­tinct schools had evolved. The man­ner­ists as­so­ci­ated with the workshop of Myson and ex­em­pli­fied by the Pan Painter hold to the ar­chaic fea­tures of stiff drap­ery and awk­ward poses and com­bine that with ex­ag­ger­ated ges­tures. By con­trast, the school of the Berlin Painter in the form of the Achilles Painter and his peers (who may have been the Berlin Painter’s pupils) favored a nat­u­ral­is­tic pose usu­ally of a sin­gle fig­ure against a solid black back­ground or of re­strained white-ground lekythoi. Polyg­no­tos and the Kleophon Painter can be in­cluded in the school of the Nio­bid Painter, as their work in­di­cates some­thing of the in­flu­ence of the Parthenon sculp­tures both in theme (e.g., Polyg­no­tos’s cen­tau­ro­machy, Brus­sels, Musées Roy­aux A. & Hist., A 134) and in feel­ing for com­po­si­tion.

To­ward the end of the cen­tury, the “Rich” style of At­tic sculp­ture as seen in the Nike Balustrade is re­flected in con­tem­po­rary vase paint­ing with an ever greater at­ten­tion to in­ci­den­tal de­tail, such as hair and jew­ellery. The Mei­dias Painter is usu­ally most closely iden­ti­fied with this style.

Vase pro­duc­tion in Athens stopped around 330-320 BC pos­si­bly due to Alexan­der’s con­trol of the city, and had been in slow de­cline over the 4th cen­tury along with the po­lit­i­cal for­tunes of Athens it­self. How­ever, vase pro­duc­tion con­tin­ued in the 4th and 3rd cen­turies in the Greek colonies of south­ern Italy where five re­gional styles may be dis­tin­guished.

These are the Apu­lian, Lu­can­ian, Si­cil­ian, Cam­pan­ian and Paes­tan. Red-fig­ure work flour­ished there with the dis­tinc­tive ad­di­tion of poly­chro­matic paint­ing and in the case of the Black Sea colony of Pan­t­i­capeum the gilded work of the Kerch Style. Sev­eral note­wor­thy artists’ work comes down to us in­clud­ing the Dar­ius Painter and the Un­der­world Painter, both ac­tive in the late 4th cen­tury, whose crowded poly­chro­matic scenes of­ten es­say a com­plex­ity of emo­tion not at­tempted by ear­lier painters. Their work rep­re­sents a late man­ner­ist phase to the achieve­ment of Greek vase paint­ing.


White ground tech­nique

The white-ground tech­nique was de­vel­oped at the end of the 6th cen­tury BC. Un­like the bet­ter-known black-fig­ure and red-fig­ure tech­niques, its col­oration was not achieved through the ap­pli­ca­tion and fir­ing of slips but through the use of paints and gild­ing on a sur­face of white clay. It al­lowed for a higher level of poly­chromy than the other tech­niques, al­though the vases end up less vi­su­ally strik­ing.

Cylix of Apollo, Attic, c. 460 BC. Apollo pours a libation

Cylix of Apollo, Attic, c. 460 BC. Apollo pours a libation

The tech­nique gained great im­por­tance dur­ing the 5th and 4th cen­turies, es­pe­cially in the form of small lekythoi that be­came typ­i­cal grave of­fer­ings. Im­por­tant rep­re­sen­ta­tives in­clude its in­ven­tor, the Achilles Painter, as well as Psiax, the Pis­toxenos Painter and the Thanatos Painter.


Hel­lenis­tic Pe­riod

The Hel­lenis­tic pe­riod (which we take to be roughly the late 4th cen­tury to the 1st cen­tury BC) is one of cul­tural de­cline in the tra­di­tional cen­tres of Greek pot­tery pro­duc­tion. Red-fig­ure paint­ing had died out in Athens by the end of the 4th cen­tury BC to be re­placed by what is known as West Slope Ware, so named af­ter the finds on the west slope of the Athen­ian Acrop­o­lis.

This lat­ter style con­sisted of paint­ing in a tan colored slip and white paint on a fired black slip back­ground with some in­cised de­tail­ing, rep­re­sen­ta­tions of peo­ple di­min­ished with this id­iom to be re­placed with sim­pler mo­tifs such as wreaths, dol­phins, rosettes, etc. Vari­a­tions of this style spread through­out the Greek world with no­table cen­tres in Crete and Apu­lia, where fig­ural scenes con­tin­ued to be in de­mand. Bricks and tiles were used for ar­chi­tec­tural and other pur­poses.

Sev­eral Greek styles con­tin­ued into the Ro­man pe­riod, and Greek in­flu­ence, partly trans­mit­ted via the An­cient Etr­uscans, on An­cient Ro­man pot­tery was con­sid­er­able, es­pe­cially in fig­urines.

Ancient Greek pottery shapes

Ancient Greek pottery shapes

A Basic Guide to Ancient Greek pottery shapes. Greek vases were used by the Greeks pri­mar­ily to store, trans­port, and drink such liq­uids as wine and wa­ter. Smaller pots were used as con­tain­ers for per­fumes and unguents.

Ancient Greek pottery shapes

Ancient Greek pottery shapes: the pure and useful forms of Greek vases

Al­abas­tron
Al­abas­tra were small Greek vases used by women for stor­ing per­fume or oil.

Am­phora
Am­phora means ”to carry on both sides.” Am­phorae were used for car­ry­ing and stor­ing solids and liq­uids.

Chous
Choes were jugs. Small ver­sions of these were as­so­ci­ated with the young. Choes are usu­ally dec­o­rated with chil­dren, per­haps learn­ing to crawl or play­ing with toy carts as in this case.

When boys were 3 years old, they were given a chous filled with wine at the An­thes­te­ria fes­ti­val. They would be al­lowed to drink the wine to prove that they were on their way to be­ing men. Some­times choes were put in the graves of chil­dren.

Chy­tra
Chy­trai were cook­ing pots. The fact that these large pots are clumsy, un­dec­o­rated and made out of rough clay is a big clue to their func­tion. Chy­trai are ba­sic cook­ing pots, used for heat­ing wa­ter or soup on the fire.

Hy­dria
Hy­driai were used to carry wa­ter. One of the daily du­ties for women was to col­lect wa­ter from the com­mu­nal foun­tain. For Greek cit­i­zens it was im­por­tant that women stayed at home as much as pos­si­ble, so usu­ally it was the slave women who queued at the foun­tain and chat­ted with each other, be­fore car­ry­ing their heavy load back in large hy­driai.

Kan­tharos
Kan­tharoi were drink­ing cups with two ver­ti­cal han­dles.

Krater
Krater comes from a word mean­ing ”mix”. Kraters were Greek vases used for mix­ing wine with wa­ter.

The Greeks thought it un­civ­i­lized to drink their wine neat, so these large bowls were used to mix wine with wa­ter. Kraters were used at drink­ing par­ties called sym­posia, where men would talk and en­joy the com­pany of male friends, whilst their wives were pre­vented from tak­ing part.

Kylix
Ky­likes were spe­cial wine cups. Ky­likes were used at sym­posia, which were af­ter-din­ner drink­ing par­ties for men.

Leka­nis
Lekanides were small, shal­low bowls used by women for stor­ing jew­ellery and trin­kets. Lekanides were of­ten given as wed­ding gifts.

Lekythos
Lekythoi were olive oil bot­tles es­pe­cially used for fu­ner­als and as grave gifts. The olive oil was an of­fer­ing to the dead per­son.

Loutrophoros
The name for this large vase means ”car­ry­ing to the bath.” Loutrophoroi were used to hold wa­ter for bridal bathing or for wash­ing bod­ies be­fore bur­ial.

For her spe­cial day, a Greek woman would be washed and per­fumed be­fore putting on fine clothes and jew­ellery.

Be­fore be­ing placed in tombs, dead bod­ies were cer­e­mo­ni­ally washed and pre­pared by women. This wa­ter was some­times stored in loutrophoroi.

Oinochoe
Oinochoai were wine jugs.

Psyk­ter
Psyk­teres were wine cool­ers. Psyk­teres were spe­cial items for the sym­po­sium. The psyk­ter would be filled with ice-cold wa­ter and set in the mid­dle of a large bowl (a krater) filled with wine, so as to cool it.

Pyxis
Pyx­ides were small pots in which women stored their cos­met­ics, pow­der or jew­ellery. Women used cer­tain plants and types of sea­weed as a form of rouge. They would also darken their eye­brows with char­coal, and lighten their skin with a whitener made from lead and vine­gar.

Stam­nos
Stam­noi were used for hold­ing wine be­fore mix­ing it with wa­ter. Stam­noi could be used at sym­posia, which were af­ter-din­ner drink­ing par­ties for men.

Proxeny

glossary

Proxeny or proxenia (Ancient Greek: προξενία) in ancient Greece was an arrangement whereby a citizen (chosen by the city) hosted foreign ambassadors at his own expense, in return for honorary titles from the state. The citizen was called proxenos (πρόξενος; plural: proxenoi or proxeni, "instead of a foreigner") or proxeinos (πρόξεινος). The proxeny decrees, which amount to letters patent and resolutions of appreciation were issued by one state to a citizen of another for service as proxenos, a kind of honorary consul looking after the interests of the other state's citizens. A common phrase is euergetes (benefactor) and proxenos (πρόξεινος τε ειη και ευεργέτης).

A proxenos would use whatever influence he had in his own city to promote policies of friendship or alliance with the city he voluntarily represented. For example, Cimon was Sparta's proxenos at Athens and during his period of prominence in Athenian politics, previous to the outbreak of the First Peloponnesian War, he strongly advocated a policy of cooperation between the two states. Cimon was known to be so fond of Sparta that he named one of his sons Lacedaemonius (as Sparta was known as Lacedaemon in antiquity).

Being another city's proxenos did not preclude taking part in war against that city, should it break out – since the proxenos' ultimate loyalty was to his own city. However, a proxenos would naturally try his best to prevent such a war and to resolve the differences that were threatening to cause it. And once peace negotiations were on the way, a proxenos' contacts and goodwill in the enemy city could be profitably used by his city.

The position of proxenos for a particular city was often hereditary in a particular family.

Promanteia

glossary

Promanteia was the privilege, bestowed upon cities or individuals by the Oracle of Delphi, to ask the Pythia in priority.

In the course of the classical period the priests of Delphi established a series of honours bestowed upon those who offered benefactions to the sanctuary, whether they were cities or individuals. The institution of promanteia was one of the privileges offered initially to cities which had offered aided the sanctuary financially. Promanteia was in fact the right to acquire an oracle before the others (yet still after the priests and the citizens of Delphi). Given the fact that oracle-giving was taking place on specific – and limited – periods of time, this right could actually be very important. From the beginning of the 4th century BC, this right continued to be accorded to individuals and to be combined with other privileges, such as prothysia and proxenia.

The Kleophon Painter

glossary

The Kleophon Painter is the name given to an anonymous Athenian vase painter[1] in the red-figure style who flourished in the mid-to-late 5th century BC. He is thus named because one of the works attributed to him bears an inscription in praise of a youth named "Kleophon". He appears to have been originally from the workshop of Polygnotos, and in turn to have taught the so-called Dinos Painter. Three vases suggest a collaboration with the Achilles Painter, while a number of black-figure works have also been attributed to him by some scholars.

The Phiale Painter

glossary

The Phiale Painter, also known as Boston Phiale Painter, was a painter of the Attic red-figure style. He was active around 460 to 430 BC. The Phiale Painter is assumed to have been a pupil of the Achilles Painter. In contrast to his master, he liked to depict narrative scenes. He painted several large calyx kraters, often with two registers of figures; unlike his master, he seems to have preferred larger vessels in general. This is shown by his white-ground works, which are not well known, but more expressive than those of the Achilles Painter. Apart from a number of lekythoi, he painted two chalice kraters in white-ground technique, a rarity at the time. His themes may be partially influenced by contemporary theatre. His preferred name for kalos inscriptions is that of Euaion, son of Aeschylus.

The Persephone Painter

glossary

The Persephone Painter, working from about 475 to 425 BCE, is the pseudonym of an ancient Attic Greek vase painter, named by Sir John Beazley after investigating a red-figure bell-krater vase of about 440 BC, which includes a mythological scene of the return of Persephone from Hades. This name vase of the Persephone Painter currently resides at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City.

The Achilles Painter

glossary

The Achilles Painter was a vase-painter active ca. 470–425 BC. His name vase is an amphora, Vatican 16571, in the Vatican Museums depicting Achilles and dated 450–445 BC. An armed and armored Achilles gazes pensively to the right with one hand on his hip. The other hand holds a spear. On the opposite surface a woman performs libation.

The Kleophrades Painter

glossary

The Kleophrades Painter is the name given to the anonymous red-figure Athenian vase painter, who was active from approximately 510–470 BC and whose work, considered amongst the finest of the red-figure style, is identified by its stylistic traits.

The Berlin Painter

glossary

The Berlin Painter (active c. 490–460s BC) is the conventional name given to an Attic Greek vase-painter who is widely regarded as among the most talented vase painters of the early 5th century BC. There are no painter signatures on any of the Berlin Painter's attributed works. From the surviving vases, it is safe to assume that he was a major painter, there are over 400 vases and fragments attributed to him.

The Berlin Painter along with his apparent rival the Kleophrades Painter was educated by a member of the Pioneer Group, who introduced red-figure painting. The Berlin Painter began working in the Late Archaic style and helped develop the Classic style of Attic red-figure pottery. Over a long career he trained many younger vase-painters, including, probably, the Achilles Painter.

Theseus, Hero of Athens

A Greek terracotta kylix (drinking cup) from Attica, depicting Theseus slaying the Minotaur. ca. 530 BCE

A Greek terracotta kylix (drinking cup) from Attica, depicting Theseus slaying the Minotaur. ca. 530 BCE.
From Vulci. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, USA)


Theseus(in Greek Θησεύς), the great legendary hero of Attica, is one of those mythological personages, whose legends it is by no means easy to disentangle, and represent in their original shape. The later belief of the Athenians, adopted and strengthened by writers of authority, represented him as a very much more historical person than he really was; and, in consequence, the rationalistic mythologists took considerable pains to draw up a narrative of his life in which the supernatural should be kept as much as possible in the back ground, and the character in which the Athenians loved to regard him, as the founder of Attic nationality, be exhibited in as prominent a light as the received traditions allowed. This was avowedly the method upon which Plutarch proceeded.

According to the commonly received traditions Theseus was the son of Aegeus, king of Athens, and Aethra, the daughter of Pittheus, king of Troezen. Other legends, however, maintained their ground, which represented him as the son of Poseidon by Aethra. WWhen reached maturity, Theseus, by his mother's directions took the sword and sandals, the tokens which had been left by Aegeus, and proceeded to Athens.

Theseus and Aethra, by Laurent de La Hyre (oil on canvas, circa 1634-1636. Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest, Hungary)

Theseus and Aethra, by Laurent de La Hyre (oil on canvas, circa 1634-1636. Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest, Hungary)

Eager to emulate Hercules, he went by land, displaying his prowess by destroying the robbers and monsters that infested the country. Periphetes, Sinis, Phaea the Cromyonian sow, Sciron, Cercyon, and Procrustes fell before the invincible hero. Arrived at Cephisus, he was purified by the Phytalidae.

Greek terracotta kylix (drinking cup) from Attica, by the Briseis Painter ca. 480 BCE, depicting  the victorious Theseus being welcomed back to Athens by Athena.

Greek terracotta kylix (drinking cup) from Attica, by the Briseis Painter ca. 480 BCE, depicting the victorious Theseus being welcomed back to Athens by Athena.
(The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, USA)

At Athens he was immediately recognised by Medea, who laid a plot for poisoning him at a banquet to which he was invited. By means of the sword which he carried, Theseus was recognised by Aegeus, acknowledged as his son, and declared his successor. The sons of Pallas, thus disappointed in their hopes of succeeding to the throne, attempted to secure the succession by violence, and declared war; but, being betrayed by the herald Leos, were destroyed.

The capture of the Marathonian bull was the next exploit of Theseus. It was this same enterprise in which Androgeos, the son of Minos, had perished. When the occasion returned on which the Athenians had to send to Minos their tribute of seven youths and seven maidens, Theseus voluntarily offered himself as one of the youths, with the design of slaying the Minotaur, or perishing in the attempt.

Theseus captures the Marathonian Bull. Detail of the Aison Cup -circa 430 BC. Salamanca Collection - National Archaeological Museum, Madrid, Spain

Theseus captures the Marathonian Bull. Detail of the Aison Cup -circa 430 BC.
Salamanca Collection - National Archaeological Museum, Madrid, Spain.

When they arrived at Crete, Ariadne, the daughter of Minos, became enamoured of Theseus, and provided him with a sword with which he slew the Minotaur, and a clue of thread by which he found his way out of the labyrinth. Having effected his object, and rescued the band of victims, Theseus set sail, carrying off Ariadne. (For the variations in the story, given by Cleidemus, the reader is referred to Plut. Thes. 19.) There were various accounts about Ariadne, but most of them spoke of Theseus as having either lost or abandoned Ariadne on the island of Naxos. He was generally believed to have had by her two sons, Oenopion and Staphylus.

The vessel in which they sailed approached Attica, they neglected to hoist the white sail, which was to have been the signal that the expedition had had a prosperous issue. The neglect led to the death of Aegeus. A vessel was in existence up to the time of Demetrius Phalereus, which it was pretended was the very ship in which Theseus had sailed to Crete. It was this vessel which was sent every year to Delos with the sacred envoys.

It is worth noting, that although Homer mentions Ariadne as having been carried off by Theseus from Crete, he says nothing about the Minotaur. All that part of the story is probably a later addition. The expedition to Crete was probably, in its original form, only one of the somewhat numerous amatory adventures of Theseus. several of which are noticed by Plutarch. Soon after he landed, Theseus is said to have instituted the festival termed Oschophoria. The origin of the Pyanepsia, and the reinstitution of the Isthmian games, were also ascribed to Theseus.

One of the most renowned of the adventures of Theseus was his expedition against the Amazons. He is said to have assailed them before they had recovered from the attack of Hercules, and to have carried off their queen Antiope. The Amazons in their turn invaded Attica, and penetrated into Athens itself, the final battle in which Theseus overcame them having been fought in the very midst of the city. Of the literal truth of this fact Plutarch finds evidence in the names of the localities and the tombs of the fallen Amazons. Cleidemus pretended even to point out the precise position of the contending forces and the fluctuatins of the combat. By Antiope Theseus was said to have had a son named Hippolytus or Demophoon, and after her death to have married Phaedra.

Theseus cycle of deeds: centre, Minotaur; around, clockwise from top, Kerkyon, Prokrustes, Skiron, bull, Sinis, sow. Attic red-figured kylix, ca. 440-430 BC. From Vulci.

Theseus cycle of deeds: centre, Minotaur; around, clockwise from top, Kerkyon, Prokrustes, Skiron, bull, Sinis, sow. Attic red-figured kylix, ca. 440-430 BC.
British Museum, London, UK.

Theseus figures in almost all the ancient heroic undertakings. He was one of the Argonauts (the anachronism of the attempt of Medea to poison him does not seem to have been noticed); he joined in the Calydonian hunt, and aided Adrastus in recovering the bodies of those slain before Thebes. He contracted a close friendship with Peirithous, and aided him and the Lapithae against the Centaurs. Aided by Peirithous he carried off Helen from Sparta while she was quite a girl, and placed her at Aphidnae under the care of Aethra. In return he assisted Peirithous in his attempt to carry off Persephone from the lower world. Peirithous perished in the enterprise, and Theseus was kept in hard durance until he was delivered by Hercules. Later writers endeavored to turn this legend into history by making Peirithous attempt to carry off Core, the daughter of Aidoneus, a king of the Molossians. Meantime Castor and Pollux invaded Attica, and carried off Helen and Aethra, Academus having informed the brothers where they were to be found. Menestheus also endeavoured to incite the people against Theseus, who on his return found himself unable to re-establish his authority, and retired to Scyros, where he met with a treacherous death at the hands of Lycomedes. The departed hero was believed to have appeared to aid the Athenians at the battle of Marathon. In B. C. 469 a skeleton of large size was found by Cimon in Sevros, and brought to Athens.

It was believed to be that of Theseus, in whose honour a temple was erected, in which the bones were deposited. A considerable part of this temple still remains, forming one of the most interesting monuments of Athens. A festival in honour of Theseus was celebrated on the eighth day of each month, especially on the eighth of Pyanepsion. Connected with this festival were two others : the Connideia, in memory of Connidas, the guardian of Theseus; and the Cybernesia, having reference to his voyage. (Dict. of Antiq. s. v. Thescia.

There can be little question that Theseus is a purely legendary personage, as thoroughly so as his contemporary Hercules. Nevertheless, in later times the Athenians came to regard him as the author of a very important political revolution in Attica. Before his time Attica had been broken up into a number of petty independent states or townships (twelve is the number generally stated) acknowledging no head, and connected only by a federal union.

Theseus, partly through persuasion, partly by force, abolished the separate council chambers and governments, did away with all separate political jurisdiction, and erected Athens into the capital of a single commonwealth. The festival of the Synoecia was celebrated in commemoration of this change. The festival which was called Athenaea was now reinstituted and termed the Panathenaea.

Theseus is said to have established a constitutional government, retaining in his own hands only cartain definite powers and functions. The citizens generally he is said to have distributed into the three classes of. Eupatridae, Geomori, and Demiurgi. That this consolidation took place some time or other, there can be no doubt. Whether is was accomplished by Theseus is another question.

The authority of Thucydides has usually been allowed to settle the matter. Thucydides, however, did but follow the prevailing opinion of his countrymen ; and if his belief raises Theseus to the rank of an historical king, it must also make the Trojan war a matter of history. It is a vain task now to attempt to decide whether there is any historical basis for the accounts of Theseus that were handed down, and still more so to endeavour to separate the historical from the legendary in what has been preserved. The Theseus of the Athenians was a hero who fought the Amazons, and slew the Minotaur, and carried off Helen. A personage who should be nothing more than a wise king, consolidating the Athenian commonwealth, however possible his existence might be, would have no historical reality. It has been urged that we have no ground for denying the personality of Theseus. In matters of this kind the question is rather "Have we any ground for affirming it ?" And for this we find nothing but the belief of the Athenians.

The connection of Theseus with Poseidon, the national deity of the Ionic tribes, in various ways (the name Aegeus points to Aegae, the sanctuary of Poseidon), his coming from the Ionic town Troezen, forcing his way through the Isthmus into Attica, and establishing the Isthmia as an Ionic Panegyris, rather suggest that Theseus is, at least in part, the mythological representative of an Ionian immigration into Attica, which, adding perhaps to the strength and importance of Ionian settlers already in the country, might easily have led to that political aggregation of the disjointed elements of the state which is assigned to Theseus.

It was probably from the relation in which he stood to the Athenian commonwealth as a whole, that his name was not connected with any particular phyle.

The column of the Dancers of Delphi

The column of the Dancers of Delphi

One of the most charming and best-known works in the museum of Delphi is the column of the Dancers of Delphi (330 - 320 BC), also known as the Acanthus Column. The fragments were found during the Great Excavation in 1894 on the terraces to the east and northeast of the Temple of Apollo.

It consist of a 13m column made of 5 drums, which at regular intervals is encircled with acanthus leaves. The column has a capital decorated with acanthus leaves. On the top of the capital, the statues of three young women have been embossed around a plant-shaped stem.

The sculptures depict three female figures (1.95m high), wearing short tunics (chitoniskoi / χιτωνίσκοι) through which the outlines of the body are clearly visible. Tehy carrying baskets (kalathos / κάλαθος) on their heads containing fruits, a symbol of abundance and fertility. Their bare feet are suspended in the air and their arms are raised. Thus creating the impression give the appearance of being suspended high in the air and dancing, which is how the sculpture gets its name.

Multiples technical details as the fastenings on the top of the capital and the shape of the upper surface of the top drum of the column, suggests that the whole column supported a colossal tripod (probably made of bronze) with its feet standing on top of the column and framing the heads of each of the dancers.

The fastenings at the top of the capital and the concave shape of the upper surface of the column drum at the level of the dancers' heads suggests that the whole ensemble supported a colossal tripod (probably made of bronze) with its feet standing on top of the column and framing the heads of each of the dancers. It has recently been supported with good evidence that the omphalos, on display also in the museum, belonged to this complex, crowning the tripod.

The monument was dedicated to the Sanctuary of Apollo at Delphi by the Athenians around 330 - 320 BC and probably depict the three daughters of the mythical Athenian king Cecrops.

highlight data

Delphi sanctuary of Apollo plan

The emplacement of the Column of the Naxians inside the Sanctuary of Apollo


The Dancers of Delphi was the inspiration for the name of a musical composition by French composer Claude Debussy. It is the opening piece of the first book of Préludes (24 pieces for solo piano, divided into two books of 12 preludes each), written between late 1909 and early 1910. The piece, in B-flat major, totals 31 bars and takes about three minutes to play.

Cookies Consent

This website uses cookies to offer you a better Browsing Experience. By using our website, You agree to the use of Cookies

Learn More